A year in review:

2012 Optimization of Beef and Forage Production in Hopkins County

 

Prepared by

Dr. Mario A. Villarino

County Extension Agent for Agriculture and Natural Resources in Hopkins County

 

Relevance: Beef Production is a 2.96 billion dollar industry in the East Region per data in the 2008 production year. The predominant beef producer in the region is a cow/calf producer with less than 100 head. All beef enterprises are also affected by climate change as well as market variability. County-based Program Area Committees firmly establish the need for educational programs targeted for beef producers enabling them to increase knowledge as well as adopt best management practices and new technologies improving product quality and producer sustainability. Hopkins County currently has over 150 active beef producers, with numerous more not registered. A preconditioning sale of stocker cattle (NETBIO) has proven to be a successful marketing tool with more than 22,000 head processed since its conception. This program will cooperate with NETBIO committee and subcommittees to resolve educational issues related to the success of the beef industry in Hopkins County, with special emphasis to the small producer. The importance of beef producer education has been identified several times thru out the year during Leadership Advisory Board sessions where the need to provide specific information to producers related to forage management and effective use of intensive grazing principles to reduce feed cost was identified.

 

 

                                                                                                                   

 

 

Response:  To properly respond to the educational issues identified by the committees involved in the plan, a series of activities were planned to promote educational experiences to beef producers in forage management. Twelve newspaper articles, 4 newsletters and four educational programs (Multi-county cow-calf clinic in Winnsboro, January 2012; Forage Conference in Emory, February 2012; Grazing tour to Sulphur Bluff, October 2012 and Private Applicator re-certification conference in Sulphur Springs, November 2012) were planned and conducted throughout the year. The educational program was evaluated using a retrospective post evaluation survey (n=71). The topics evaluated included nitrate toxicity, prussic acid poisoning, use of perennial grasses for hay meadows, importance of weed identification, importance of weed control, effective use of water resources, and effective use of electric fencing among others.

 

 

                                                                                  

 

 

 

Results: According to the survey results, the majority of the responders were small acreage farmers (33% between 1 and 100 acres). Post evaluation comparisons indicated a significant knowledge increase in all evaluated topics.

 

Topic                                                                                                                          % increase

Nitrate toxicity                                                                                                                       58.6

Prussic acid poisoning                                                                                                            55.7

Establishment of perennial pastures or hay meadows                                                             45.6

Basics on electric fencing                                                                                                       44.4

Water resources and planning for the future                                                                            40.6

Importance of weed identification                                                                                           37.7

Benefit of weed and brush control                                                                                             29 

Average                                                                                                                                         31  

 

From the adoptable technological best management practices intention to adopt was as follows:

 

Best Management Practice                                                                                     % to adopt

Use of appropriate management following a drought                                                             89.4

Use of recommended practices and technology to control weeds                                          81.5

Use of soil analysis to improve nutrient management                                                              76.7

Use of alternative or new water supplies                                                                                 52.1

 

Economic Impact: 92.6% of the attending participants identified economic benefit from the training with an average of $4,085 per participant for a total anticipated economic benefit of $8.08 per acre farmed.

 

 

                                                                                                 

 

 

 Next steps:  

As feed prices continue to be a major operation cost in beef operations the educational efforts will continue to provide better management options of forages locally grown in Hopkins County.

 

Acknowledgements:  

 

The Hopkins County Agricultural and Natural Resources program want to recognize the leadership of the Beef Program Area Committee, The North East Texas Beef Improvement Association and local news media for their support during the implementation of this plan.

 

Upcoming events:  Northeast Texas Cattleman’s Conference, January 30, 2013. Winnboro City Auditorium, 8:00 to 2:30 pm. Cost $15 meal included. Sponsored by Texas AgriLife Extension Service and NETBIO. Four  CEU’s  for Private Applicators. Call 903-885-3443 to register.

 

 

                                                                            

 

Educational programs of the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service are                                                                              

open to all people without regard to race, color, sex, disability, religion, age, or national origin.                                                         

The Texas A&M University System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the County Commissioners Courts of Texas Cooperating

____